Disclaimer – this is not my target. I wish it was.

JP at the EyesNeverClosed blog has thrown out a challenge in the form of an ePostal match, through his Twitter feed. Rules and the target are posted here. Anyone on Twitter can shoot it, and submit a picture of their result by June 30.

I went to the local indoor range today during the lunch hour to shoot it with my Browning Buck Mark, and I took away some lessons.

* I am not and have never been a bullseye shooter. I need to learn slow fire techniques.

* I should eat before I go.

* I shouldn’t go when I have 40 minutes to shoot. The target is pressure enough.

* I shouldn’t go to a range where the targets oscillate 5 degrees once per second, and take 5 minutes to stop oscillating. This turns it into the Bianchi movers stage, which I don’t think were part of the rules.

* The red dot sight I had from my old Buck Mark fifteen years ago may need replacing. I can’t seem to get it adjusted like I should be able to.

None of these are meant as excuses, I just need to learn more. My best score was 12 out of 20. I may post it later. I may not.

NERD ALERT: As my mother was fond saying, “Many people are not engineers.” As I read through this post before publishing, I realized it is a topic that may not be attractive to anyone who doesn’t have at least a small nerdy streak. If at any time you feel your eyeballs glazing, please scroll down and look at the gun porn a while. Then you can skip to the Results. I won’t mind, honest.

Like most of you, I have several gun projects in the works. And, like most of you, I have limited resources to complete those projects, both time and money. I sat down to rank my three most emotionally attractive projects by how much I wanted to do them, and they came out this way: build an AR-15; pimp out my Ruger 10/22; and finish re-finishing my shotgun.

But, my engineer mind took over, and I wondered what would happen to that order if I used my engineering project management skills to decide priorities.

Projects can be prioritized using a number of criteria. After some thought a research, the ones I used were

Results: Will the project get me where I want to be? How sure am I that I can achieve the project like I want to?
Utility: How much will I use the finished project? How much will it affect my shooting, both accuracy and frequency?
Effort: How hard will it be to complete, and how long will it take?
Cost: How much will it cost, and where will the money come from. Include Cash Flow and Return on Investment (ROI) if applicable.

I ranked each criterion 0 through 5. For Results and Utility, 5 is high, and for Cost and Effort, 5 is low. I then added them up, to rank the projects.

Here’s what I found.

AR-15 Build

I want an entry level AR-15 I can use for 3-gun and home defense. I was set to buy one, then I borrowed a friend’s AR to take on a shooting trip, the same time EyesNeverClosed was live tweeting a lower receiver build. I’m convinced now that I can do all the work needed to assemble this gun, so I’m going to build my own.

Results: 4. This will be a new gun, so it will certainly get more use than the one I don’t have now. Granted it’s an entry level, but I’m not going to use it in the sandbox or the USPSA Multi-Gun Nationals, so I can live with that.
Utility: 4. I expect I will shoot this gun as much as any other, in 3-gun and other competition.
Effort: 3. I’m not sure what skills I’m going to have to develop, but as a Glock Armorer I have confidence I can do it.
Cost: 2. This one is the most expensive. I’m budgeting $750, and I’m having to save up as I go. I have a side project that I’m dedicating the proceeds to, so it doesn’t come out of normal cash flow, until I run out of that money, any way.
Final Score: 13

Super 10/22 Build

Right now my Ruger 10/22 looks more like Steve Rogers, but I want to turn it into Captain America. This means a new bull barrel and stock, plus more Duracoat. Optics are optional.

Results: 2. Yes, it will look really cool, and it may be a lot more accurate, but it’s not a big leap over my stock 10/22.
Utility: 2. I probably won’t shoot it any more than I do now.
Effort: 4. This is fairly simple once I get the parts. Hey, it’s a 10/22!
Cost: 3. $250, cash flowed.
Final Score: 11

Shotgun Refinish

Some time ago I got a wild hair and decided to refinish Lee, my Mossberg 500 shotgun. So far I’ve got the bluing stripped off, and I admit, I’ve put off completing the project for some time. To finish, all I need to do is apply some flat black Duracoat and add a new black polymer stock.

Results: 5. This will get me a shotgun that I can use the rest of my life.
Utility: 3. I will mostly use this for trap and home defense, until I get into 3-gun.
Effort: 4. Fairly easy, can be done in one day. Maybe even easier than that, but I’ve never used Duracoat before.
Cost: 4. $100, and I can do this out of normal cash flow.
Final Score: 16

RESULTS

Come here if the discussion made you dizzy.

Finishing my Mossberg came out on top, which was a small surprise, since I really wanted to build the AR first. But, I trust the process.

The AR and the 10/22 come out very close to each other, and if I didn’t already have a 10/22 I could shoot, it would probably have gotten a higher Results score, and it would be first.

So now I set some goal dates, based on cash flow, what else. I plan to have the shotgun done by July 4th. I set a goal date of November 8 for the AR build, and a tentative date of the end of the year for the 10/22, depending on cash flow after that.

Does this approach get me anything over my gut feelings? Yes. This process has forced me to really evaluate these projects, and spell them out. As a result, I will have my shotgun back sooner than if I had waited.

I also have a new framework to use when I consider new projects.

I’ll be sure to report on these projects as I go.

One thing about being a nerd my age is by now I have quite a large collection of neat hobby stuff. In a previous life, I dabbled quite a bit in photography, back when photos were taken on something called “film.” For a while I even had a neat deal going – I took pictures of people’s weddings, and they paid me money, and I bought photo equipment with the money, and the IRS said it was okay.

Well, I don’t take photos for money any more, but I still have the lighting equipment. So I decided to haul some of it down from the attic and set it up in the workshop.

Click to embiggen

Here are some results of my attempts. I think Oleg and Yamil can relax.

Bucky, my Browning Buck Mark

The Duke, my Glock 21SF

The Glock family

Sergei, my SKS

There were more in the session, but I think I need a different camera and more patience. Look for more examples in future posts.

Oleg, you made it look so easy at the Blogger Shoot. Unfair.

On June 14, 1775, the Continental Congress adopted a resolution creating the Continental Army. This was a significant move in the formation of the United States, as it sought to unify the military forces of the 13 colonies under one command – General George Washington – in its fight against the British.

Before this, since the battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, the Revolution had relied almost entirely on the efforts of local militia, groups of men who fought for their freedom with their own guns and their own resources. While these men were not part of the Continental Army, they were an effective force, and continued to be a vital part of the Revolution, even after the formation of the Army. But now, with a central command, there was the beginnings of a national armed force.

Later, after the Revolution was won, and the Constitution established, Congress sought to make right an oversight. It adopted the first set of ten amendments, known collectively as the Bill of Rights. One of those, the Second Amendment, recognized the part the militias played in the Revolution, when it said that the militia was “necessary to the security of a free state,” and it enumerated the “right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

So, how did we get to the “well regulated militia = National Guard” idea? This misunderstanding rises from the fact that most people don’t use the word “regulated” the way our founding fathers did. They used it in the same way we use it when speaking with a gunsmith about a double barreled shotgun or a double rifle. In that sense, to regulate these guns means to adjust them so that both barrels shoot to hit the same target point. A well regulated militia is then a group of citizens who are proficient in arms, and can all shoot well enough to hit the same targets.

Today’s “well regulated militia” means that we citizens, men and women, must be prepared to protect our homeland, the same way the militia did in 1775. We need to practice so we can all hit the same target point if the time comes. While fewer of us may come to shooting from a military background, this doesn’t excuse us from that responsibility, nor preclude us from that right.

Interestingly, exactly two years after the establishment of the Continental Army in 1775, the Congress adopted the familiar Stars and Stripes as the national flag of the United States.

While you celebrate Flag Day today, remember our army as well, and the well regulated militia that stands behind them.