Change In Strategy

The strategy for law enforcement response to an active shooter has generally been to cordon off the affected area, form an attack team, wait until the entire team is assembled, then work methodically through the venue until the assailant is found. At that point, the team would wait for instructions on how to proceed, perhaps to negotiate a surrender.

We saw this strategy put to use at Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and other incidents. In each case, the police formed a SWAT team or other team, then went in en masse to find the shooters.

Meanwhile, the shooters, unopposed, killed innocent disarmed victims. And when the police finally arrived at the shooters’ location, they waited. And the killers continued killing.

Finally, when the police made their move, they found that the killers had committed suicide.

+++++

Now comes word of a change in strategy.

My niece is a Sheriff’s Deputy in Oklahoma, and has been for a number of years. She routinely shoots perfect scores in her qualifications.

We got word of her most recent training exercise, called “First Officer.” In this scenario she was simulated to be the first officer on the scene at an active shooter incident at a school.

So, she made her way quickly through the school, found the shooter, and put three shots center of chest, before he could react. Incident over.

She said this was how they were being taught to deal with active shooters. I think it will probably work out for the victims a lot better than the old one.

A really good treatment of the change in direction is discussed at Police Magazine’s website.

Project Vera Update

Just found out that my upper has shipped from Palmetto State Armory. Now all I need to get is a charging handle and a bolt carrier group.

There is a gun show next weekend so I may just load up with cash and see what I can find.

Good thing I bought PMAGs before the late unpleasantness.

Reply From Senator Isakson

In December, I sent an email to all my elected officials, including Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA), expressing my feelings about all the renewed gun control talk following the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

Today I received a response from Senator Isakson:

Dear Mr. L…..:

Thank you for contacting me regarding the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary. I apologize for the delay in responding. My office has experienced a significant increase in the volume of incoming mail, but please know your concerns were taken into consideration at the time your letter was first received. I appreciate and understand your concerns and am grateful for the opportunity to respond.

I am terribly saddened by the loss of innocent lives at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. I ask all Georgians to join me in praying for the victims and the families affected by this horrendous tragedy.

I do not believe that bans on assault weapons or cartridges are the answer to ending acts of massviolence, nor will such measures pass Congress. As history shows us, the 10-year ban on assault weapons that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 could not prevent the mass shooting at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. The common threads running through these shootings are mental health issues. I believe that more effective and sensible solutions are those that focus on background checks and mental health care, rather than restrictions on our Second Amendment right to bear arms. I look forward to working for commonsense solutions that keep our children safe without infringing upon our Constitutional rights.

Thank you again for contacting me.  Please visit my webpage at http://isakson.senate.gov/ for more information on the issues important to you and to sign up for my e-newsletter.

Sincerely,
Johnny Isakson
United States Senator

It’s obvious he opposes any new gun bans, although he looks willing to consider and expansion of background checks. As I have said before, if done right, this isn’t a bad thing, but capitulating and turning background checks into a national firearms permission and tracking system is disaster waiting to happen.

He also says nothing about magazine capacity restrictions, although he has indicated in the past that he thinks this would pass. I would hope he would stay with his correct assertion that no AWB would make any difference on crime, since the same is true about magazine capacity.