Why Aren’t You Involved?

I saw this post over at No Lawyers, Only Guns and Money, and I agree 100 percent.

Question: Why aren’t you an NRA member? Or a Second Amendment Foundation member? Why don’t you get a Concealed Weapons License? Why don’t you write your Congressman or Senators about gun issues?

Answer: “I don’t want to get on The List.”

Seriously. I have had more than one person tell me that if they do something to support their rights, they will go on The List. You know, that List of gun owners, rights supporters, subversives, and right wing revolutionaries that the armies of jack booted thug will print out when they go door to door when (with kudos to Ron Larimer) the balloon goes up.

To that I respond, what makes you think you aren’t already on The List?

  • Have you ever bought a gun from a FFL and had a background check run?
  • Do you subscribe to any gun magazines?
  • Have you ever bought ammunition or shooting supplies online? Ever use a credit card?
  • Have you ever visited a gun blog or website without setting your browser to private settings?

Every one of these things has already brought you to the attention of the people who make The List.

Of course, as @GunRightsAlert in John’s post points out, if enough of us join or speak up, pretty soon The List gets too big for them to handle. And that is the point.

The Real Power of Concealed Carry

Concealed Weapons PermitRecently, with all the increased media fever following the Newtown school shooting, the issue of concealed carry has been beaten back and forth like a really bad tennis match. More like a match between Venus Williams and Stephen Hawking. The left, thinking every concealed carry longs to get involved in a shootout, asks “What good is one lone good guy with a gun against a bad guy?”

Sadly, they are missing the point. The true power of concealed carry is that it puts doubt in the minds of potential criminals. If there is the possibility that the criminal will face opposition, they will go elsewhere.

You see, most of the lunatics who carry out these mass shootings are not only mentally ill, they are cowards. We know this because when they are confronted by real opposition they either kill themselves or surrender immediately. It’s also been shown that they pick their targets based on the knowledge that they will be unopposed.

But, if there is a chance there will be armed opposition, they choose to go elsewhere.

How do we know? Consider this case from my home town, Kennesaw, Georgia. Famously, every head of household in Kennesaw is required by city ordinance to possess a gun, and, as a result, the burglary and violent crime rates here are among the lowest in the nation. There are no mall shootings, no theater shootings. Why? Because the odds are pretty good that someone – many someones – will be present who are carrying concealed guns. And the bad guys just don’t like the odds, and they take their business

But specifically, there was an incident at a local Waffle House in 2010 where two patrons were open carrying, late at night. As it turns out, some thugs were looking to rob the restaurant, and sent in a scout first, who saw the two men sitting with guns.

Then,

Meanwhile, conscientious Cobb County Police Officer D. Lowe had noticed suspicious cars sitting behind the restaurant in the dark and decided to investigate.  He caught men with masks and rifles who had been preparing to rob the Waffle House.  The criminals informed the police that they had changed their mind upon discovering armed customer and were waiting for Matt and J.P. to leave.  Ironically, the police car was pulling in to the parking lot just as Matt and J.P. were driving away.  In other words, had Matt and J.P. not been armed, the robbery probably would have occurred before the police intervened.

And, if this is what’s visible and known, then what’s invisible, concealed, and not known? In that case, the bad guys, the coward nut jobs, don’t want to know. They go somewhere else.

And that is the real power of concealed carry.

Then There is Gingrey

Rep. Phil Gingrey
Courtesy of The Marietta Daily Journal

No sooner had I gotten a letter from Senator Saxby Chambliss, than I read in  The Marietta Daily Journal  about a speech that my Congressman, Dr. Phil Gingrey (R, GA 11) gave on Thursday. In part, here is what the paper said.

Gingrey said he was open to considering certain gun control measures in the wake of the Connecticut elementary school massacre.

“There are some problems, and maybe these huge magazines even for someone who says, ‘look, I just use an AR-15 for target practice,’ but do you really need to be standing there shooting at a silhouette a shot a second or even quicker with that kind of weapon? For what purpose?” Gingrey asked. “I would be willing to listen to the possibility of the capacity of a magazine.”

Mr. Gingrey, I will say this.

We will not be made scapegoats. We will not be treated like criminals or lunatics because of the actions of criminals and lunatics. 

No new gun laws.

No magazine limits.

Work with us, Mr. Gingrey, or we will work to retire you.

Response from Senator Chambliss

Last month, I wrote emails to all my elected officials following the shootings in Connecticut. I just received this response from Senator Saxby Chambliss:

Dear Mr. L…..:

Thank you for writing me regarding the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Your taking the time to contact me is appreciated.

I have always been a strong supporter of Second Amendment rights, and I will continue to ensure the rights of gun owners will not be further infringed upon.  We must make certain that the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens are not unfairly impeded.  I believe that the ability of sportsmen, hunters, gun enthusiasts and citizens concerned with their personal safety to own a gun, whether for sport or protection, is clearly defined in the Constitution and must not be compromised.

In response to recent tragic and high-profile acts of violence, there is a renewed focus on government regulation of guns.  It is likely that Congress will soon have an extensive and detailed conversation about all of the potential causes of these crimes, including mental health issues, depictions of violence in television, movies, and video games, and firearms.

I know that dialogue regarding acts of violence will likely result in a wide range of legislative proposals seeking to address the underlying causes.  As these pieces of legislation come before me in the Senate, I will keep your thoughts in mind.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may be of assistance to you in the future.  In the meantime, if you would like to receive timely e-mail alerts regarding the latest congressional actions and my weekly e-newsletter, please sign up via my web site at: www.chambliss.senate.gov.

I have to admit, reading the second to last paragraph gave me doubts as to how Senator Chambliss would face the coming assaults on our freedoms. But, then again, it may just me a generic sentence inserted by a staffer. In fact, it would work as a response even if I called for door-to-door confiscation.

Then I re-read, and one sentence stood out.

I have always been a strong supporter of Second Amendment rights, and I will continue to ensure the rights of gun owners will not be further infringed upon. 

Senator Chambliss: that is what I wanted to hear. And that is what you will be held to in the next election. You can count on it.